14. Intellectual Property Rights [The following are taken from RFC 2026. It is not entirely clear whether all of this is necessary at this stage. Please can someone explain it to me?] The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on the IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF Secretariat. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice this standard. Please address the information to the IETF Executive Director. Copyright (C) The Internet Society (date). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Appendix A.1 - A-News Article Format The obsolete "A News" article format consisted of exactly five lines of header information, followed by the body. For example: Aeagle.642 news.misc cbosgd!mhuxj!mhuxt!eagle!jerry Fri Nov 19 16:14:55 1982 Usenet Etiquette - Please Read body body body The first line consisted of an "A" followed by an article ID (analogous to a message ID and used for similar purposes). The second line was the list of newsgroups. The third line was the path. The fourth was the date, in the format above (all fields fixed width), resembling an Internet date but not quite the same. The fifth was the subject. This format is documented for archeological purposes only. Articles MUST NOT be generated in this format. Appendix A.2 - Early B-News Article Format The obsolete pseudo-Internet article format, used briefly during the transition between the A News format and the modern format, followed the general outline of a MAIL message but with some non-standard headers. For example: From: cbosgd!mhuxj!mhuxt!eagle!jerry (Jerry Schwarz) Newsgroups: news.misc Title: Usenet Etiquette -- Please Read Article-I.D.: eagle.642 Posted: Fri Nov 19 16:14:55 1982 Received: Fri Nov 19 16:59:30 1982 Expires: Mon Jan 1 00:00:00 1990 body body body The From header contained the information now found in the Path header, plus possibly the full name now typically found in the From header. The Title header contained what is now the Subject content. The Posted header contained what is now the Date content. The Article-I.D. header contained an article ID, analogous to a message ID and used for similar purposes. The Newsgroups and Expires headers were approximately as now. The Received header contained the date when the latest relayer to process the article first saw it. All dates were in the above format, with all fields fixed width, resembling an Internet date but not quite the same. This format is documented for archeological purposes only. Articles MUST NOT be generated in this format. Appendix A.3 - Obsolete Headers Early versions of news software following the modern format sometimes generated headers like the following: Relay-Version: version B 2.10 2/13/83; site cbosgd.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 2/13/83; site eagle.UUCP Date-Received: Friday, 19-Nov-82 16:59:30 EST Relay-Version contained version information about the relayer that last processed the article. Posting-Version contained version information about the posting agent that posted the article. Date- Received contained the date when the last relayer to process the article first saw it (in a slightly nonstandard format). In addition, this present standard obsoletes certain headers defined in [Son-of-1036] (see 6.22 Also-Control: cancel <9urrt98y53@site.example> See-Also: <i4g587y@site1.example> <kgb2231+ee@site2.example> Article-Names: comp.foo:charter Article-Updates: <i4g587y@site1.example> Also-Control indicated a control message that was also intended to be filed as a normal article. See-Also listed related articles, but without the specfic relationship with followups that pertains to the References header. Article-Names indicated some special significance of that article in relation to the indicated newsgroup. Article- Updates indicated that an earlier article was updated, without at the same time being superseded. These headers are documented for archeological purposes only. Articles containing these headers MUST NOT be generated. Appendix A.4 - Obsolete Control Messages This present standard obsoletes certain control messages defined in [RFC 1036] (see 7.5 all of which had the effect of requesting a description of a relaying or serving agent's software, or its peering arrangements with neighbouring sites, to be emailed to the article's reply address. Whilst of some utility when Usenet was much smaller than it is now, they had become no more than a tool for the malicious sending of mailbombs. Moreover, many organizations now consider information about their internal connectivity to be confidential. version sendsys whogets senduuname "Version" requested details of the transport software in use at a site. "Sendsys" requested the full list of newsgroups taken, and the peering arrangements. "Who gets" was similar, but restricted to a named newsgroup. "Senduuname" resembled "sendsys" but restricted to the list of peers connected by UUCP. Historically, a checkgroups body consisting of one or two lines, the first of the form "-n newsgroup", caused check-groups to apply to only that single newsgroup. Historically, an article posted to a newsgroup whose name had exactly three components of which the third was "ctl" signified that article was to be taken as a control message. The Subject header specified the actions, in the same way the Control header does now. These forms are documented for archeological purposes only; they MUST NO LONGER be used. Appendix B - Collected Syntax TO BE DONE[< Prev] [TOC]
Newer | Older |
---|---|
News Article Format July 2001 News Article Format April 2001 News Article Format February 2000 |
--- ../usefor-article-05/Intellectual_Property_Rights.out July 2001 +++ ../usefor-article-06/Intellectual_Property_Rights.out November 2001 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -13. Intellectual Property Rights +14. Intellectual Property Rights [The following are taken from RFC 2026. It is not entirely clear whether all of this is necessary at this stage. Please can someone explain it to @@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. - This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + Appendix A.1 - A-News Article Format The obsolete "A News" article format consisted of exactly five lines @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ when the latest relayer to process the article first saw it. All dates were in the above format, with all fields fixed width, resembling an Internet date but not quite the same. + This format is documented for archeological purposes only. Articles MUST NOT be generated in this format. @@ -142,18 +143,18 @@ Appendix A.4 - Obsolete Control Messages This present standard obsoletes certain control messages defined in - [RFC 1036] (see 7.7 all of which had the effect of requesting a + [RFC 1036] (see 7.5 all of which had the effect of requesting a description of a relaying or serving agent's software, or its peering arrangements with neighbouring sites, to be emailed to the article's reply address. Whilst of some utility when Usenet was much smaller than it is now, they had become no more than a tool for the malicious sending of mailbombs. Moreover, many organizations now consider information about their internal connectivity to be confidential. - version sendsys whogets senduuname + "Version" requested details of the transport software in use at a site. "Sendsys" requested the full list of newsgroups taken, and the peering arrangements. "Who gets" was similar, but restricted to a