usefor-usepro-00 August 2004

[TOC]
6.2.2.1.  Example

      From: "example.all Administrator" <admin@noc.example>
      Newsgroups: example.admin.obsolete, example.admin.announce
      Date: 4 Apr 2002 22:04 -0900 (PST)
      Subject: cmsg rmgroup example.admin.obsolete
      Message-ID: <rm-example.admin.obsolete-20020404@noc.example>
      Approved: admin@noc.example
      Control: rmgroup example.admin.obsolete

      The group example.admin.obsolete is obsolete. Please remove it
      from your system.
[TOC]
#Diff to first older
NewerOlder
usefor-usepro February 2005
usefor-usepro December 2004
usefor-usepro September 2004
News Article Format and Transmission May 2004
News Article Format and Transmission November 2003
News Article Format June 2003
News Article Format April 2003
News Article Format February 2003
News Article Format August 2002
News Article Format May 2002
News Article Format November 2001
News Article Format July 2001
News Article Format April 2001
News Article Format February 2000

--- ../usefor-article-13/1_Example.out          May 2004
+++ ../usefor-usepro-00/1_Example.out          August 2004
@@ -1,41 +1,13 @@
-5.6.5.  Example
+6.2.2.1.  Example
 
-      Path: foo.isp.example/
-         foo-server/bar.isp.example?10.123.12.2/old.site.example!
-         barbaz/baz.isp.example%dialup123.baz.isp.example!x
+      From: "example.all Administrator" <admin@noc.example>
+      Newsgroups: example.admin.obsolete, example.admin.announce
+      Date: 4 Apr 2002 22:04 -0900 (PST)
+      Subject: cmsg rmgroup example.admin.obsolete
+      Message-ID: <rm-example.admin.obsolete-20020404@noc.example>
+      Approved: admin@noc.example
+      Control: rmgroup example.admin.obsolete
 
-        NOTE: That article was injected into the news stream by
-        baz.isp.example (complaints may be addressed to
-        abuse@baz.isp.example). The injector has taken care to record
-        that it got it from dialup123.baz.isp.example. "x" is a dummy
-        tail-entry, though sometimes a real userid is put there.
-
-        The article was relayed, perhaps by UUCP, to the machine known,
-        at least to old.site.example, as "barbaz".
-
-        Barbaz relayed it to old.site.example, which does not yet
-        conform to this standard (hence the '!' path-delimiter). So one
-        cannot be sure that it really came from barbaz.
-
-        Old.site.example relayed it to a site claiming to have the IP
-        address [10.123.12.2], and claiming (by using the '/' path-
-        delimiter) to have verified that it came from old.site.example.
-
-        [10.123.12.2] relayed it to "foo-server" which, not being
-        convinced that it truly came from [10.123.12.2], did a reverse
-        lookup on the actual source and concluded it was known as
-        bar.isp.example (that is not to say that [10.123.12.2] was not a
-        correct IP address for bar.isp.example, but simply that that
-        connection could not be substantiated by foo-server).  Observe
-        that foo-server has now added two entries to the Path.
-
-        "foo-server" is a locally significant name within the complex
-        site of many machines run by foo.isp.example, so the latter
-        should have no problem recognizing foo-server and using a '/'
-        path-delimiter.  Presumably foo.isp.example then delivered the
-        article to its direct clients.
-
-        It appears that foo.isp.example and old.site.example decided to
-        fold the line, on the grounds that it seemed to be getting a
-        little too long.
+      The group example.admin.obsolete is obsolete. Please remove it
+      from your system.
 

Documents were processed to this format by Forrest J. Cavalier III